Sears, Docs, and
Rock 'n' Roll
Radio Marketing Wiz Brian Farrish Discusses His Plan For
Songs That Sell
Interview by Carrie McLaren
In May 1994, marketing visionary Brian Farrish set out to
make radio commercials as creative as the songs. His brainstorm:
to promote and place adsongs--song-length commercials--on
the radio.
Like infomercials and product placements, adsongs would
help integrate commercials with programming. Farrish and his
company, Wriite Radio, aim to make the transition from song
to commercial as soothing as possible by eliminating the current
commercial "interruptives." Instead of using jolting 30-second
spots, advertisers will buy up entire 3+ minute breaks and
use them for song-length ads.
How
it works: A company such as 7Up hires an adsong agency such
as Farrish's Wriite Radio to create a 7Up adsong. 7Up pays
only for the radio time to air the adsong; the adsong company
makes its money by selling CD and cassette singles of the
adsong in stores.
Whether anyone would actually buy adsongs remains to be
seen. However, Coke-a-Cola pulled off a similar stunt in 1971,
selling 500,000 copies of their "I'd Like To Teach The World
To Sing" jingle as a single. And the charts today are loaded
with soundtracks and TV themes, endorsements, licensing deals,
etc.
Farrish abhores the commercialism of art, of course, but
adsongs aren't real songs, they're just song-form commercials,
aka "Product-Placements-Into-Yet-Unwritten- Songs-Making-Them-Commercials."
In fact, he says one of the advantages of adsongs is that
they eliminate the problem of "selling out." You can't sell
out what you already sold. Or something like that.
The following interview was conducted via email.
Carrie McLaren: I'm a little confused about how far along
the concept is. Are you already producing and placing adsongs?
Brian Farrish: No. Adsongs are in the critical second
step, finding U.S. national advertisers. Stage one was seeing
if enough new-music non-country stations would consider accepting
adsongs.
Why not country stations?
Because of the relatively low sales volume of country
music, per radio airplay. Also because of the almost non-existent
crossover of country artists.
What companies have you asked so far?
It's too soon to say; the advertiser campaign (stage two)
is just getting started.
What musicians are you working with?
Talent searching (stage three) is not being performed
yet.
Is anyone else working on adsongs?
I am aware of certain people who are considering
similar ventures. Some are waiting to see what comes of my
efforts, and some want to join my efforts.
Over 200 FM radio stations have agreed to accept adsongs
on a case-by-case basis, so have you noticed substantial difference
between how stations with different music formats react? Like
do modern rock and adult contemporary respond differently
to the idea?
No. The only similarity between people who liked
the idea was that they had experienced an earlier musically-intensive
attempt at marketing. If the particular person I was speaking
to was in the broadcasting business when the Coke tune came
out, then this person would become an advocate of the idea.
That's surprising considering radio audiences are so
different. Like marketing studies say that older Americans
are more persuaded by information-based advertising, advertising
that provides information about the product. Whereas young
people are more persuaded by image advertising (which is what
adsongs are), advertising that evokes some sort of "hip" or
pleasant feeling that doesn't really have to do with anything
about the product.
This is true. The sales effectiveness of adsongs
will drop as you skew upwards in age. Overall, the prime effectiveness
will be in the 12-24 year old (pop-music buying) range. Secondary
effects will carry on up until about 30. Adsongs
would be of no use for anyone above age 35.
But then most manuals on marketing to generation x say
they're more cynical than other groups, so it would seem that
they wouldn't want advertisers trying to pull something over
on them.
Absolutely. Listeners will know, of course, that
an entire adsong is indeed an ad, because of the disclosures
both before and after each airing.
What sort of criteria do stations use to decide whether
to accept an adsong or not?
The quality of the music, the lyrics, and the revenue.
But adsongs aren't songs, they're commercials, and radio
stations don't turn commercials down if they're bad.
Yes they do. It doesn't happen often with regular
ads, but it will with adsongs. Stations view adsongs not as
commercials, but as paid programming. They feel listeners
will think the stations chose to play some particular
adsong.
So stations view them as programming and listeners view
them as commercials. Neat. How will you distribute adsong
releases? Are you planning on working with the majors?
The releases are to be singles, distributed in traditional
music channels, with the possibility of also being distributed
with the advertised product or service.
One of the interesting points you make is that songs
on the radio invariably promote something. A Hootie
song is basically an ad for Hootie CDs, concerts, t-shirts,
the Hootie lifestyle. That Rembrandts song is an ad for Friends
and Coke and milk, like Friends is an ad for the
Rembrandts.
Yes, all songs promote something, mostly good feelings.
If, hypothetically speaking, Epic Records pays a bunch
of stations to play Silverchair, could that be considered
an adsong?
Not by my definition, because paid promotion (using
Fair Air Communications or a similar service) does not involve
the Third Party, the product or service advertiser.
In other words, they can't just be selling music, they
have to be selling something else, too. That way there's a
third party to pay for the ad while your company makes money
from music sales.
Yes. The other situation is simply a radio-infomercial
style of a record company.
And adsongs also can't be retroactive, correct? If someone
licensed the rights to "Nothing Compares 2U" and then created
a fragrance called 2U, that wouldn't be an adsong.
No.
What you describe is already being done. It would not be an
adsong because the music was not written expressly for the
ad.
Do you know a lot about music? What do you listen to?
I have a fair knowledge of past popular music, with
an emphasis on the early rock era, the '70s and '80s. I try
to constantly monitor various stations here in LA, and I also
review the various charts.
You mention that adsongs are particularly appropriate
for products that have intrinsic personalities, like clothes,
fragrances, cars and amusement parks... How come pants have
a personality and drinks don't?
Because pants and other clothing items are worn by
one particular person (say, a Polo shirt worn by your friend
Bob). Drinks and other food items, on the other hand, are
not exclusive to one person but are seen with different people
each day. This morning Bob may have a Coke, whereas this afternoon
Mary will have one. This evening Tom will have one. But all
the while, Bob is still wearing his Polo.
But one person consumes one Coke, just like one person
wears the shirt and a billion people can wear the same shirt
if they all shop at the Gap. What about tires?
It has nothing to do with how many different people
use a product. It has instead to do with how many different
people use a product that you know. Of the billion
people that bought a champagne-colored Supernova-brand dress
shirt, how many of them do you work with? Of all the people
you know, who might you describe as a "jogging suit" type,
or a "sweater" type, or a "Polo" type?
Well, zero, but I know some "yellow carbonated beverage"
types and a few closet alcoholics... whatever... this sort
of goes back to image advertising. Adsongs aren't supposed
to talk about the product directly, right? It's more about
promoting happy feelings. So if you're advertising a blender
that crushes ice, has 19 speeds, a money-back guarantee, etc.,
the adsong wouldn't be about that stuff, it's be about, I
dunno, all the great people you'd meet at parties.
You have the basic idea.
Thank you, Bryan.
Thank you.
|